wish to play with old ka-el
wish to play with old ka-el
Pro players use their brains as maphack but noobs just use maphack as their brains
Some of those heroes should've remained the same , like venomancer with 1st+ulti=kill , the imba naix if you knew how to play him , the gondar nowadays isnt' pwnage that much , check the old one , you'd see a difference.Many things changed and it's probably for the best or worst , who knows ? We just go on and on , still , i'd like to play some old dota maps , it really be fun
Dota v1.? (can't remember) version by eul , sniper could stun tower XD Wouldn't you like that to happen now haha
For what I remember, the old Naix was the most IMBA hero, being able to destroy the fountain.
Its actually the most insane hero. Amount of money team gets by tracks early game makes gamebraking difference. Therefor u can simply let it offlane with 0 farm to get some lvls and start abusing.the gondar nowadays isnt' pwnage that much
ok, you ready for this ?
there is no "insane" hero, there never was any "imbalanced" hero ... ever.
not even that old ass naix if you remember him (eating ppl alive), not even him, not even the old ass enchantress (big hp, range and all that)
not even the old ass viper(his damage per hp loss passive was working on denies too, you were basically lasthitting everything), but not even him.
you could've dealt with everything, at any moment in time, with certain team setups and playstyle
just because some hero was very strong at a stage of the game doesn't mean it's "insane" or "imbalanced", you could've just raped him at a point where he wasn't.
you probably just got mentally traumatized cause you played bad and allowed him to use his best moment, now memory of him raping you is stuck in your heads forever XDD
sure, there have always been heroes which were better at something than others, the flashy ones, but they are actually the easiest to beat
versatile heroes, heroes which can do multiple things well, and change their style if need be, are what you can consider "better" in general, because if something goes wrong they can adapt, on the other hand if something doesn't go wrong, you can probably go for something very strong at something, not just a little of everything, so yeah, brings me back to the first point
everything is situational, someone is always "better" than someone at something at some point during some stage with some line-up vs some line-up. bang.
ah, i think i woke up now, normally i would ignore your noobism XD but i guess i'm more talkative after i wake up, which makes no fucking sense actually.
When i think better the worst imbalance in dota is Slayzer captain.